Camera obscura
From Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia


The camera obscura (Lat.
dark chamber) was an
optical device used in drawing,
and one of the ancestral threads
leading to the invention of
photography. In English,
today's photographic devices are
still known as "cameras".
The principle of the camera
obscura can be demonstrated with
a rudimentary type, just a box
(which may be room-size) with a
hole in one side, (see
pinhole camera for
construction details). Light
from only one part of a scene
will pass through the hole and
strike a specific part of the
back wall. The projection is
made on paper on which an artist
can then copy the image. The
advantage of this technique is
that the
perspective is right, thus
greatly increasing the realism
of the image (correct
perspective in drawing can also
be achieved by looking through a
wire mesh and copying the view
onto a canvas with a
corresponding grid on it).
With this simple do-it-yourself
apparatus, the image is always
upside-down. By using mirrors,
as in the 18th century overhead
version illustrated in the
Discovery and Origins section,
it is also possible to project a
right-side-up image. Another
more portable type, is a box
with an angled mirror projecting
onto
tracing paper placed on the
glass top, the image upright as
viewed from the back.
As a pinhole is made smaller,
the image gets sharper, but the
light-sensitivity decreases.
With too small a pinhole the
sharpness again becomes worse
due to
diffraction. Practical
camerae obscurae use a
lens rather than a pinhole
because it allows a larger
aperture, giving a usable
brightness while maintaining
focus.


A freestanding room-sized camera
obscura built by Professor elin
o'Hara slavick's Conceptual
Photography class in 2002 at the
University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill. (Buildings and
grounds removed the gorgeously
steep tin roof with a spinning
turbine and replaced it with
this boring tile roof.) One of
the pinholes can be seen in the
panel to the left of the door.
Some camera obscura have been
built as tourist attractions,
often taking the form of a large
chamber within a high building
that can be darkened so that a
'live' panorama of the world
outside is projected onto a
horizontal surface through a
rotating lens. Although few now
survive, examples can be found
in
Grahamstown in
South Africa, the
Observatory in
Bristol,
Portslade village and
Eastbourne Pier in
England,
Kentwell Hall,
Long Melford,
Suffolk,
England,
Aberystwyth and
Portmeirion in
Wales,
Kirriemuir,
Dumfries and
Edinburgh in
Scotland,
Douglas, Isle of Man,
Lisbon in
Portugal, and California in
Santa Monica,
Los Angeles at the
Griffith Observatory and
San Francisco at the
Cliff House, in
North Carolina is Chris
Drury's
[1] "Cloud
Chamber for the Trees and Sky"
[2],
Havana in
Cuba,
Eger in
Hungary, and
Cádiz in
Spain
[3]. There is even a
portable example which Willett &
Patteson tour around England and
the world.
Discovery and Origins


An
Iraqi
Muslim scientist named Abu
Ali Al-Hasan
Ibn al-Haitham (965-1039
CE), known in the
West as Alhacen, is credited
with the discovery of the camera
obscura while carrying out
practical experiments on
optics in his
Book of Optics.[1]
In his various experiments, Ibn
Al-Haitham used the term “Al-Bayt
al-Muthlim”(Arabic:
البيت المظلم), translated in
English as dark room. In the
experiment he undertook, in
order to establish that light
travels in time and with speed,
he says: “If the hole was
covered with a curtain and the
curtain was taken off, the light
traveling from the hole to the
opposite wall will consume
time.” He reiterated the
same experience when he
established that light travels
in straight lines. The most
revealing experiment which
indeed introduced the camera
obscura was in his studies of
the half-moon shape of the sun’s
image during eclipses which he
observed on the wall opposite a
small hole made in the window
shutters. In his famous essay
"On the form of the Eclipse" (Maqalah-fi-Surat-al-Kosuf)
(Arabic:
مقالة في صورةالكسوف) he
commented on his observation
"The image of the sun at the
time of the eclipse, unless it
is total, demonstrates that when
its light passes through a
narrow, round hole and is cast
on a plane opposite to the hole
it takes on the form of a
moon-sickle”.
In his experiment of the sun
light he extended his
observation of the penetration
of light through the pinhole to
conclude that when the sun light
reaches and penetrates the hole
it makes a conic shape at the
points meeting at the pinhole,
forming later another conic
shape reverse to the first one
on the opposite wall in the dark
room. This happens when sun
light diverges from point “ﺍ”
until it reaches an aperture
“ﺏﺤ” and is projected through it
onto a screen at the luminous
spot “ﺩﻫ”. Since the distance
between the aperture and the
screen is insignificant in
comparison to the distance
between the aperture and the
sun, the divergence of sunlight
after going through the aperture
should be insignificant. In
other words, “ﺏﺤ” should be
about equal to “ﺩﻫ”. However, it
is observed to be much greater
“ﻙﻁ” when the paths of the rays
which form the extremities of
“ﻙﻁ” are retraced in the reverse
direction, it is found that they
meet at a point outside the
aperture and then diverge again
toward the sun as illustrated in
figure 1. This was indeed the
first accurate description of
the Camera Obscura phenomenon.


In camera terms, the light
converges into the room through
the hole transmitting with it
the object(s) facing it. The
object will appear in full
colour but upside down on the
projecting screen/wall opposite
the hole inside the dark room.
The explanation is that light
travels in a straight line and
when some of the rays reflected
from a bright subject pass
through the small hole in thin
material they do not scatter but
cross and reform as an upside
down image on a flat white
surface held parallel to the
hole. Ib Al-Haitham established
that the smaller the hole is,
the clearer the picture is.
History
Although the principles of the
pinhole camera have been
known since antiquity, the
camera obscura was first
described by
Ibn al-Haitham (Alhacen) in
his
Book of Optics (c.
1000).[1]
Several decades after Ibn al-Haitham's
death, the
Song Dynasty
Chinese scientist
Shen Kuo (1031-1095
AD) experimented with camera
obscura, and was the first to
apply
geometrical and
quantitative attributes to
it in his book of 1088 AD, the
Dream Pool Essays.[2]
Its potential as a drawing aid
may have been familiar to
artists by as early as the
15th century;
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519
AD) described camera obscura in
Codex Atlanticus.
Johann Zahn's Oculus
Artificialis Teledioptricus Sive
Telescopium was published in
1685. This work contains
many descriptions and diagrams,
illustrations and sketches of
both the camera obscura and of
the
magic lantern.


A freestanding room-sized camera
obscura in the shape of a camera
located in
San Francisco at the
Cliff House in
Ocean Beach (San Francisco)
The
Dutch Masters, such as
Johannes Vermeer, who were
hired as painters in the
17th Century, were known for
their magnificent attention to
detail. It has been widely
speculated that they made use of
such a camera, but the extent of
their use by artists at this
period remains a matter of
considerable controversy.
Early models were large;
comprising either a whole
darkened room or a tent (as
employed by
Johannes Kepler). By the
18th century, following
developments by
Robert Boyle and
Robert Hooke, more easily
portable models became
available. These were
extensively used by amateur
artists while on their travels,
but they were also employed by
professionals, including
Paul Sandby,
Canaletto and
Joshua Reynolds, whose
camera (disguised as a book) is
now in the
Science Museum (London).
Such cameras were later adapted
by
Louis Daguerre and
William Fox Talbot for
creating the first photographs.
References
-
^
a
b
Nicholas J. Wade, Stanley
Finger (2001), "The eye as
an optical instrument: from
camera obscura to
Helmholtz's perspective",
Perception 30
(10), p. 1157–1177.
-
^
Needham, Volume 4, Part 1,
98.
Sources
-
Hill, D.R.
(1993), ‘Islamic Science and
Engineering’,
Edinburgh University Press,
page 70.
-
Lindberg,
D.C. (1976), ‘Theories of
Vision from Al Kindi to
Kepler’,
The University of Chicago
Press, Chicago and
London.
-
Mustapha
Nazeef (1940), ‘Ibn Al-Haitham
As a Naturalist Scientist’,
in Arabic, published
proceedings of the Memorial
Gathering of Al-Hacan Ibn
Al-Haitham, 21 December
1939, Egypt Printing.
-
Needham,
Joseph (1986). Science
and Civilization in China:
Volume 4, Physics and
Physical Technology, Part 1,
Physics. Taipei: Caves
Books Ltd.
-
Omar, S.B.
(1977). ‘Ibn al-Haitham's
Optics’, Bibliotheca
Islamica, Chicago.
|